Front façade of the United States Supreme Court Building, highlighting the Equal Justice Under Law phrase. Via Wikimedia Commons.

The Supreme Court announced on Thursday, that after a months long investigation, they could not identify the individual who leaked a draft of court’s Dobbs decision. Justices called the leak a “grave assault on the judicial process,” and the Supreme Court marshal was tasked with investigating. The marshal reviewed forensic evidence and interviewed nearly 100 employees, the court’s statement said. “But the team has to date been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence,” the report continued. No evidence that the court’s computers were attacked by an outside force were found by the marshal.

“Investigators continue to review and process some electronic data that has been collected and a few other inquiries remain pending,” the report said. “To the extent that additional investigation yields new evidence or leads, the investigators will pursue them.”

In his announcement of the investigation, Justice Roberts has this to say:

“To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed. The work of the court will not be affected in any way.”

According to USA Today:

The court’s announcement Thursday came more than eight months after a draft opinion in Mississippi’s challenge to Roe v. Wade leaked on May 2. The unprecedented breach of Supreme Court protocol, which showed how the conservative justices might overturn Roe, led to protests across the country. The court’s final opinion, which was unveiled in June, closely tracked with the earlier leaked draft.

The leak immediately shifted the landscape in one of the nation’s most divisive culture war issues, prompted a flurry of reaction from both anti-abortion and abortion-rights groups, and raised questions about the court’s deliberative process.

Read the full report here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Howard
Howard
1 year ago

BS. !!

Michael J Kelly
Michael J Kelly
1 year ago

President Trump said “the Swamp is Deep” and this affirms his assessment of our Branches of the Federal Branches of Government. I’m not surprised, my resolve to Right this overall corruption is akin to riding a Wild horse.

Gary Hutchinson
Gary Hutchinson
1 year ago

So you are telling me the Supreme Court couldn’t figure out who leaked the info. Humm. I smell a coverup.

Tom Tucker
Tom Tucker
1 year ago

Okay then, fire all100 of the treasonous bstrds and start over.

Anthony J Bauer
Anthony J Bauer
1 year ago

Pathetic!!!

Grayfox41
Grayfox41
1 year ago

A phantom leader at the highest level of justice. Who would have guessed it?

Grayfox41
Grayfox41
1 year ago

Well, since I am blocked from editing, what I really ment to type was “A phantom leaker…”

Xena
Xena
1 year ago

They couldn’t find theira××××s with bo th hands

Warren
Warren
1 year ago

If I was investigating and now one would speak out I would dismiss all of the clecks an replace them with new ones that were under new confidential rulings. If the present ones become upset maybe they will speak up on who leaked the infomation

Frank
Frank
1 year ago

Why not try lie detector testing?

Thomas Kauffman
Thomas Kauffman
1 year ago

Perhaps it’s time for the democrats to acknoiwledge they engineered/sponsored/funded this whole scam! Filthy communists!

James
James
1 year ago

Supreme Court infiltration by woke saboteurs is the problem.

Jawad
Jawad
1 year ago

I’ll wager the individual could indeed be identified, HOWEVER the protecting DemoCreep powers-that-be could not be overcome or even by-passed.

trackback
10mg cialis dosage
1 year ago

[…] price of cialis per pill 5 milligram […]