Texas District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk is likely to strike down the FDA’s approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. If the Trump-appointed judge grants a nationwide injunction, mifepristone would be banned across the United States. If drug access is not limited, rules would likely be reinstated that women desiring an abortion can only receive the pills from a physician.
The Alliance Defending Freedom advocacy group brought this case to the district court claiming that the FDA’s fast-tracked approval of the drug “exceeded its regulatory authority”. Additionally, the group is arguing that they broke their legal responsibility to “protect the health, safety, and welfare” of pregnant women by “ignoring” evidence of the pill’s harmful nature.
Mifepristone is the first of two pills that make up the abortion pill process. It is taken sequentially with Misoprostol. The two pills target different aspects of the embryo’s development. Mifepristone cuts off the nutrient supply to the developing embryo and Misoprostol causes the uterus to expel it.
This likely decision comes after the 2021 ruling which expanded abortion pill access. The recent FDA decision made pills more accessible via telemedicine, mail delivery, and pharmacy pickup. Abortion pills account for more than half of abortions nationwide.
Virginia Democrats Back Abortion Up To Birth, Kill Bill Banning Abortion After 15 Weeks
While 18 states in the US already have restrictions on abortion pills, this ruling would deny abortion pill access to people living in Democrat-controlled states. In response to the possible ruling, pro-abortion voices have been urging women to stockpile pills. Additionally, pro-abortion-funded courses now teach a workaround that uses Misoprostol only. They also are vocalizing their hopes to expand emergency clinic access, making it clear that the workaround would create damaging physical effects on the women who partake.
This decision would be a win for pro-life groups who have been focusing on the dangerous abortion pill for years. It follows Dobbs v. Jackson in the attempt to eliminate legal abortions in America.
Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on websites
I just like the helpful information you provide in your articles
Very well presented. Every quote was awesome and thanks for sharing the content. Keep sharing and keep motivating others.
maslak escort
Very well presented. Every quote was awesome and thanks for sharing the content. Keep sharing and keep motivating others.
I’m often to blogging and i really appreciate your content. The article has actually peaks my interest. I’m going to bookmark your web site and maintain checking for brand spanking new information.
istanbul escort
Prohibiting abortions is unpopular with 60% of the population.
The banning of pharmaceutical drugs that work on a woman’s body should NEVER be tolerated. The CONSTITUTIONAL SOLUTION should ALWAYS be allowed in America regardless of belief. FORCING one’s beliefs on others is PURE EVIL!! By allowing one ban to go into effect is the start of allowing ANY ban to be allowed…THIS SHOULD MOT BE TOLETATED!!
Not rain on anyones parade, however I do remember a judge from California handing down a decision on gun control not long ago. In that case it was determent that a district juge only has authority in their district. Don’t get me wrong, I am against abortion at any stage. That doesn’t change the fact that if a district in one case doesn’t have that authority in one case, then another judge won’t have either.
[…] District Court Judge Likely to Ban Abortion Pill Nationwide […]
[…] District Court Judge Likely to Ban Abortion Pill Nationwide […]
USA our Lord has always asked us to protect our youngest Citizens , MOMS . Let us protect , honoring Dads as they work to protect their families. Viva BAMBINI, Daddies and MOMMAS. USA . Judge Matthew Kascsmsryk, District Court Judge , we pray our Lord hears our prayer . Amen. Send the BABIES home that they may pursue “life , liberty and happiness” .